Edge AI for machine health

Sense. Decide. Act. In real time, built in.

Failure detection engineered to your latency target and deployed on-edge: a dedicated, vendor-independent detection layer for machines and components, running inside the control loop on microcontrollers and FPGAs.

What we do

A dedicated failure-detection layer for your machines

Vendor-independent, built for a defined set of failure modes, and validated on simulated and real fault data. You bring the domain knowledge of your machine; we bring sensing, detector design and hardware implementation.

  1. 01Sense

    Sensor placement

    Where to place sensors in a machine so a given set of failure modes actually becomes observable.

    Observability analysis and experimental design on simulation models of your machine, so instrumentation is decided on evidence rather than habit.

  2. 02Decide

    Detector strategy

    A combination of detectors, complementary in what they catch and how fast, engineered against an explicit target detection latency.

    Physics- and simulation-informed design with stated uncertainty bounds and worst-case scenarios before anything reaches your machine.

  3. 03Act

    Embedded deployment

    Detectors run on-edge on microcontrollers and FPGAs, inside the control loop, fast enough to act on a fault while it is still forming.

    Delivered as firmware or as an IP core for an FPGA already in your bill of materials. No cloud connection required.

Why Dynetic

Reservoir computing on FPGA hardware

For the failure modes where microseconds decide whether a part is scrapped or a spindle is damaged, we run reservoir-computing detectors directly in FPGA fabric. Sensor streams are processed at up to 667 MHz with fixed, predictable latency.

667 MHzsample-rate inference with deterministic latency
LatencyDeterministic, by construction
One inference per sample, tens of nanoseconds from sample in to decision out, cycle-accurate. A property no software ML runtime can offer.
EdgeOn the machine, not in the cloud
Detectors run inside the controller. No connectivity, no data backhaul, no subscription, and the shop-floor data stays on the shop floor.
FleetVendor-independent
The same detection layer applies to a mixed machine fleet, independent of the machine builder and of the monitoring the machine shipped with.
TargetEngineered to a latency target
Every engagement starts with the failure modes and the time you have to react. Detectors are designed and validated against that number.
FootprintTiny, low-power IP core
Cellular-automata reservoirs are boolean logic and map directly onto FPGA lookup tables. The core drops into spare fabric at milliwatt power.
PipelineAutomated training and implementation
Only the readout layer is trained, so iterations are fast. Our pipeline explores hyperparameters and returns Pareto-optimal implementations: power, clock, throughput and resource use, your choice.

Where it pays off

Three failures that still get past conventional monitoring

Examples from precision machining, the first domain we work in. Each one is a fault that forms faster than periodic analysis can react.

Tool wear, chipping and breakage

Problem

A chipped edge drifts parts out of tolerance; a breakage can wreck the workpiece and the spindle in one revolution.

How we catch it

Spindle-current and vibration detectors, placed for observability of the cutting zone, separate normal wear from chipping and flag a breakage transient in time to retract.

  • Spindle current
  • Vibration

Regenerative chatter

Problem

Self-excited tool-workpiece vibration scars the surface, shortens tool life, hammers the spindle and can escalate from stable to unstable during one pass of the tool.

How we catch it

A fast detector tracks the onset signature of regenerative instability as it grows, giving the control system a usable window to act before the surface is marked.

  • Acoustic emission
  • Accelerometer

Thermal dimensional drift

Problem

Over a long run, process and drive heat move the machine geometry and walk parts out of tolerance, which often remains unseen until inspection.

How we catch it

Detectors fuse temperatures across the machine structure with axis-position feedback to separate genuine drift from noise, so the trend is caught and can be compensated before parts fall out of tolerance.

  • Structure temperatures
  • Axis position

The same approach applies to

  • Servo drives and motor current signatures
  • Laser welding and additive manufacturing melt pools
  • Pumps, compressors and gearboxes
  • Launch-vehicle engine test stands
  • Spacecraft telemetry
  • Test and measurement trigger logic

Let's talk

Is there a failure that still gets past your monitoring?

Come with one machine, one failure mode and the time you would need to react. We will sketch a detector for it: which signals, where to sense them, and what hardware it takes.

Emailinfo@dynetic.io

Or write to info@dynetic.io

Who we are

Two engineers with experience in intelligent monitoring and fault detection on real hardware

Portrait of Jonas Kantic

Jonas Kantic

Co-Founder

  • Reservoir computing
  • FPGA design
  • Embedded neural networks

Doctoral researcher at TU Munich, Chair of Integrated Systems, on adaptive AI for real-time analysis of high-frequency sensor data. He is lead author of ReLiCADA, a published reservoir-computing design algorithm, and works in FPGA design and embedded neural networks.

LinkedIn profile of Jonas Kantic (opens in a new tab)
Portrait of Andreas Koch

Andreas Koch

Co-Founder

  • Fault detection
  • Embedded AI
  • Aerospace systems

Aerospace and robotics engineer; industrial PhD at Airbus Defence and Space on onboard anomaly detection for spacecraft telemetry. He built machine-learning fault detectors for multivariate sensor streams and ran them on space-grade FPGA and real-time hardware.

LinkedIn profile of Andreas Koch (opens in a new tab)